<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Minimum Social Safety Net</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.just-say-why.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/24/minimum-social-safety-net/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.just-say-why.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/24/minimum-social-safety-net/</link>
	<description>Don&#039;t Say No, Just Say Why. You name it, politics, religion, style, you&#039;ll find it here.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:03:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: tomtom</title>
		<link>http://www.just-say-why.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/24/minimum-social-safety-net/comment-page-1/#comment-2931</link>
		<dc:creator>tomtom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 04:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.just-say-why.com/blog/?p=265#comment-2931</guid>
		<description>Our economy is a requirement for a strong country, or could be part of the infrastructure. Every state should have a state bank. Banks also need better regulation. We need to reinstitute the safeguards the Republicans destroyed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our economy is a requirement for a strong country, or could be part of the infrastructure. Every state should have a state bank. Banks also need better regulation. We need to reinstitute the safeguards the Republicans destroyed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.just-say-why.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/24/minimum-social-safety-net/comment-page-1/#comment-2929</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 14:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.just-say-why.com/blog/?p=265#comment-2929</guid>
		<description>Do we need to ensure that we will always have an automobile industry? Then we may need to consider nationalizing one of them. Won&#039;t we always need to be making tanks? Maybe not. We have the billion dollar industrial military complex that will gladly charge us $200 for a hammer. Keep it private.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do we need to ensure that we will always have an automobile industry? Then we may need to consider nationalizing one of them. Won&#8217;t we always need to be making tanks? Maybe not. We have the billion dollar industrial military complex that will gladly charge us $200 for a hammer. Keep it private.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Waylin</title>
		<link>http://www.just-say-why.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/24/minimum-social-safety-net/comment-page-1/#comment-2926</link>
		<dc:creator>Waylin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.just-say-why.com/blog/?p=265#comment-2926</guid>
		<description>You mean a theory, like the theory of evolution? the word theory seems to imply something not proven to the anti evolution crowd. Theory or not, it&#039;s all about safety net. So Britain needs to start taxing the rich again. So what. Big wah! So do we!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean a theory, like the theory of evolution? the word theory seems to imply something not proven to the anti evolution crowd. Theory or not, it&#8217;s all about safety net. So Britain needs to start taxing the rich again. So what. Big wah! So do we!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Schlecht</title>
		<link>http://www.just-say-why.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/24/minimum-social-safety-net/comment-page-1/#comment-2922</link>
		<dc:creator>David Schlecht</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 04:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.just-say-why.com/blog/?p=265#comment-2922</guid>
		<description>Britain, like the US is broke because they bought into the foolishness of voodoo economics (or Thatcherism as they cal it). We&#039;re still waiting to get trickled on by the billionaires. The socialist democracies around the globe are better off than us, mainly because they didn&#039;t buy into the foolishness. Germany, which is considerably more socialist than America is in financial difficulties because so much of their economy is based on exports, but they aren&#039;t panicing because of their social safety net.

It is indeed a theory, a proven theory. I&#039;m guessing theory doesn&#039;t preclude working examples.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Britain, like the US is broke because they bought into the foolishness of voodoo economics (or Thatcherism as they cal it). We&#8217;re still waiting to get trickled on by the billionaires. The socialist democracies around the globe are better off than us, mainly because they didn&#8217;t buy into the foolishness. Germany, which is considerably more socialist than America is in financial difficulties because so much of their economy is based on exports, but they aren&#8217;t panicing because of their social safety net.</p>
<p>It is indeed a theory, a proven theory. I&#8217;m guessing theory doesn&#8217;t preclude working examples.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cindy</title>
		<link>http://www.just-say-why.com/blog/index.php/2009/05/24/minimum-social-safety-net/comment-page-1/#comment-2921</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 19:01:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.just-say-why.com/blog/?p=265#comment-2921</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an interesting perspective, but it brings to mind this question. If that system works so well, why is Britain almost broke? Have they mismanaged? Didn&#039;t understand the concept? Or does the concept only work in theory?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an interesting perspective, but it brings to mind this question. If that system works so well, why is Britain almost broke? Have they mismanaged? Didn&#8217;t understand the concept? Or does the concept only work in theory?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
